Skip to main content
frontier

Profound Lists 88 Open Roles, Pay Up to $395k

By Elena Petrova

Profound's Hiring Surge: The Numbers

Zero G Talent's board lists 66 active Profound postings as of this week, seven added in the past seven days. The salary band runs $70,000 to $395,000, median $200,000. Profound operates an AI visibility platform that tracks how sites are interpreted and crawled by ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Microsoft Copilot, Meta AI, DeepSeek, and Google AI Overviews, surfacing AI Visibility, Source Citations, Brand Sentiment, and Content AEO metrics.

Role Location Salary Band (USD/year)
VP of Account Management New York, NY $200,000 – $300,000, according to Zero G Talent's board
Software Engineer, Infrastructure New York, NY $140,000 – $300,000
AI Strategist, Team Lead New York, NY $180,000 – $280,000, Zero G Talent's board found
Tech Lead Manager, Foundations San Francisco, CA $230,000 – $275,000
Security GRC Specialist New York, NY $230,000 – $275,000
Forward Deployed Engineer New York, NY $140,000 – $260,000

Growth Signals from the Founders

In a Kleiner Perkins interview, co-founder and CEO James Cadwallader described the pace: the company has hired roughly 80–90 people in under a year, with new-join photos posted weekly. "We've had to start deleting meeting rooms and putting desks in meeting rooms… we're like sardines in there right now," he said. Profound has signed a lease for a London office, predominantly go-to-market, and a San Francisco office focused on engineering. Mark Ebert, who scaled 6sense to a $250 million exit managing hundreds in go-to-market, now leads that function. Dylan, the co-founder and CTO, heads product engineering.

The Series A closed in January and February. By April and May, the revenue forecast had quadrupled. "It was sort of like a step function obvious space," Cadwallader said. He acknowledged the risk: "Too fast definitely exists. You can break the model if you push too hard." He described the team as "tenacious, scrappy, fast moving."

Why the Market Demands This Talent

BenchLM's July 2026 leaderboard tracks 285 large language models (99 supported, 101 estimated) across 321 benchmarks with real pricing and runtime data. No single system dominates answer generation. A query routed to Claude Mythos 5 (Anthropic's current leader at 83.93 on BenchAlign) may return a different citation set than one routed to Gemini 3 Pro, Grok 4.5, or MiniMax M3. Each model weights capabilities differently (agentic behavior highest at 22 percent, math lowest at 5 percent), so visibility in one does not guarantee visibility in another.

Model proliferation compounds the problem: 15 new models launched in July 2026 alone, and xAI climbed three spots in the provider race that month. Open-weight models such as DeepSeek-R1 and MiniMax M3 let researchers and startups build custom reasoning pipelines without API dependencies, expanding the answer engines a brand must monitor. Reasoning models such as OpenAI's o1 (September 2024) and o3 (April 2025) process each query in more steps, which changes citation patterns.

Enterprise adoption adds demand. Google Cloud now offers search across business data with a single prompt, summarization of complex documents, and agents that use reasoning to understand intent. Those features run on platforms that ingest, index, and serve private data through LLM endpoints. The brand that structures its knowledge for retrieval — clean chunks, tagged metadata, version control — wins the citation. Profound's salary bands reflect the scarcity of people who grasp both the retrieval engine and the model.

Companies don't hire for prompt engineering. They hire for the systems that decide what content survives retrieval, what citations reasoning models trust, and what answers agents surface when acting for users.

What a Hiring Chair Sees at the Table

Austin McDonald, former senior engineering manager and hiring committee chair at Meta, broke down the framework in a Hello Interview discussion. Committees review the full packet, from phone screen through onsite follow-ups, and make both a hire and a level decision in the same room. That dual gate trips up many candidates. "I see tons of candidates getting down-leveled from staff to senior, senior to midlevel," he said. Behavioral interviews are "the number one interview type that is underprepared for" and often the differentiator at senior levels.

Structured interviewing — identifying signal areas like initiative, perseverance, conflict resolution, leadership, and communication — is psychology-backed bias reduction. But the same structure can feel choppy when interviewers tick boxes: "okay we're done with conflict resolution, now on to growth." Candidates who treat each segment as a disconnected test rather than a continuous story undersell their scope.

McDonald recommended a CARL format — context, action, result, learnings — and advised rating projects by involvement, impact, and scope before picking stories. "Your stories are probably better than you think they are," he said after over 200 coaching sessions. "Almost always a case that your stories are more interesting than you think they are."

That gap between self-assessment and interviewer perception shows up in salary negotiations. Candidates who articulate specific learnings, such as what they'd take to the next project, signal the reflection capacity structured interviews are designed to surface. Conversely, McDonald flagged a red flag that recurs in final-round debriefs: "If someone does not admit to me any weakness or does not tell me about any times when they made mistakes… I don't believe you." Authenticity, not polish, is the edge.

"Likeability does play a big role. We're naturally oriented to talk to someone and see: do we trust this person? Do we like them? Do they feel like us?"

Inside Profound's Interview Room

Profound's core product monitors how sites are processed by all major answer engines. It surfaces those same metrics, then layers autonomous workers for every marketing function on top.

Infrastructure roles set the technical bar. A Software Engineer, Infrastructure at the $140,000–$300,000 range designs systems that ingest, deduplicate, and query crawl data from heterogeneous AI endpoints. The Tech Lead Manager, Foundations role at $230,000–$275,000 adds architectural ownership. Security GRC Specialist at the same band reflects a customer base that includes enterprise brands requiring SOC 2, GDPR, and vendor-risk artifacts before they connect their analytics to Profound's crawlers.

On the commercial side, the VP of Account Management and AI Strategist, Team Lead roles test whether a candidate can teach a CMO why ChatGPT's citation logic differs from Perplexity's, then map that difference to a content calendar the client's team can execute. Forward Deployed Engineers bridge the gap: they ship custom integrations, debug why a client's product pages stop appearing in AI answers after a model update, and feed those findings back to the product team as feature requests. The salary bands for these roles ($180,000–$300,000) sit above typical solutions-engineering comp, reflecting the dual requirement of deep technical credibility and consultative selling.

Profound hires people who have already worked inside the "black box" its marketing describes. If you haven't reverse-engineered a citation map, argued with a throttled API, or explained to a non-technical stakeholder why their brand sentiment flipped negative after a model update, the screen is where the conversation ends.


Working in frontier tech? Zero G Talent tracks the openings: see every open Profound role, browse frontier tech jobs, the companies hiring, and the people building the field.

Ready to Start Your Space Career?

Browse frontier jobs and find your next opportunity.

View frontier Jobs