They Never Built a Motorcycle. Now Andreessen-Backed Startup Hires 4.

What Infinite Machine’s Screen Actually Rewards

Infinite Machine’s first-party board lists four New York openings, including two added in the past seven days. The batch spans production, customer operations, retail and creative direction for a company selling the P1 and Olto electric two-wheelers. Its own materials frame that work as part of a push to make alternatives to cars credible in cities.

No individual applications are public, so the record cannot establish that applicants are leading with shipped hardware, rejecting automotive pedigree or following a new résumé order. The hiring materials offer a narrower, defensible signal: Infinite Machine describes itself as a vehicle company seeking creative, curious and committed people, while the openings and products make physical execution and post-car thinking concrete. Any stronger claim about what the screen rewards would require interview records or applicant data that are not available.

Read conservatively, the materials suggest a practical hiring test: can the person take a physical idea through build and release, and defend why the result should serve an urban trip rather than simply imitate a car? Mission language can point the way; hardware, certification, repair and city rules make the answer testable. That is an inference from the role and product briefs, not a published rubric.

The company’s careers page says it is hiring engineers, designers and operators to help build vehicles and shape urban transportation. It calls for creative, curious and committed people but does not publish an itemized knockout checklist or screening rubric. Taken together, the roles and product briefs point to specific physical-system problems rather than the number of automotive job titles on a résumé.

“The future of transport in cities is many types of vehicles and you’ll use the one that makes sense depending on your use case.”

— said in a Cheddar interview

The Olto makes that thesis concrete. It is a seated electric two-wheeler for bike-lane use, yet The Verge’s April 2026 review said it blurs familiar vehicle categories and aims to replace a car. The earlier P1 is the car-lane model; the Olto is a second product built around a different trip. For applicants, those product distinctions make category judgment and urban-use judgment as concrete as engineering skill.

Co-founders Eddie Cohen and Joseph Cohen came from software, which The Verge connects to the app-centered Olto and its many app-controlled features. Software roots do not make this a software company. A finished vehicle must still handle its weight, certification and repair work.

During WIRED’s Olto review, the integrated mount for the supplied U-lock broke off the frame. Cofounder Eddie Cohen said the version tested was a flimsy 3D-printed prototype and said the final version should be stronger. The account makes the distinction between prototype work and product work concrete, but it does not reveal Infinite Machine’s interview rubric.

Hardware makes that progression visible. In March 2025, Infinite Machine opened a roughly 13,000-square-foot headquarters in Long Island City that combines a showroom, prototyping factory, warehouse and design studio. The P1 had already launched in 2023, and the WIRED lock-mount episode supplies a documented example of why build experience matters in a new category: prototype choices can affect the version a customer receives.

Published specifications and reviews describe the Olto as an app-connected, heavy bike-lane vehicle whose legal mode depends on location. Its operating modes fall under different state e-bike and e-moto rules; setup asks where the rider lives, and a New York City configuration caps it at 15 mph. Cohen also said regular bike shops could repair the vehicle and order parts. Those constraints give applicants specific problems to discuss and show that the company’s mission is tied to operating in a city, not only to styling a prototype.

The mission therefore lands in concrete work: make a distinct vehicle understandable, manufacturable, legal and repairable. That is the clearest test suggested by the job and product materials.

The Open Roles and Where They Sit

Zero G Talent’s first-party board and Infinite Machine’s careers page list the same four advertised roles, all based in New York. The table separates first-party details from third-party estimates.

Pay is the least dependable screening clue in that table. One vacancy posts a salary band, another names no figure, and two have estimated ranges rather than company offers. Location and work setup are firmer signals; function labels need more care.

The public team map remains incomplete. A Nonlinear Project snapshot places the design vacancy under Design and the retail vacancy under Sales. The supplied records do not place the factory or customer-facing positions within a formal reporting structure. Their titles mark distinct jobs, but a third-party department tag is not an org chart.

Location gives a firmer signal than reporting structure. Every available work-mode record lists the role as in-office or on-site, and Alion’s company profile agrees on the headquarters location. The same careers page also names broader interests: software engineers, mechanics, electric-vehicle engineers, industrial designers and content creators. Those are open calls rather than tracked vacancies, but they place the current production and design jobs inside a wider effort to build personal electric vehicles.

The tracked openings are therefore best read as the immediate build-and-support system around the company’s P1 and Olto, not a conventional automotive staffing chart. The first-party board is the best current count available, but it is not the only one circulating.

Why the Role Count Is Unsettled

Public trackers disagree about the openings. The gap does not indicate separate hiring programs or a sudden change in hiring plans. It reflects uneven coverage between a live job feed and job-board snapshots. Unless noted, the source records were checked October 21, 2026.

The employee-data service tracks an older subset and warns that old postings often go out of date. It may accurately describe the vacancies it follows without showing the full current list.

The daily-history site has a timing problem instead. Its panel misses the latest refresh, while live snippets show newly added roles. It says nonmembers see new listings a day later, so a recent addition can look like inactivity—or make part of the inventory disappear from a public count.

Another site mixes its labels: the headline, application text and job results disagree. That inconsistency weakens its count. The older four-role headline shows only that a larger set once existed, not that the same positions remained open in October.

The freshest feed marks the factory and customer-facing vacancies as the newest, while the sales and design openings predate them. None of the trackers provides a planned hire count, production deadline or accepted-offer total.

One company profile estimates 51 to 200 employees, but that figure does not show how many people the four vacancies would add. Applicants should not treat an aggregate tracker total as proof that Infinite Machine is building a large automotive department. The aggregate is noisy; the individual briefs are clearer. Taken together, they point to work that connects a physical artifact to its user, operating rules and city.

How Applicants Are Tailoring for the Post-Car Filter

The products give an application response a sharper target. Infinite Machine sells two electric two-wheelers with different uses, and their specifications force a candidate to defend a particular urban trip rather than recite a general promise about transportation.

Source: Infinite Machine’s October 2026 product pages.

Infinite Machine supplied those figures; they are company claims, not independent performance results. The distinction between the products nevertheless gives the application brief practical meaning. The P1 travels in car lanes; the Olto belongs in bike lanes. The company is offering alternatives to a car-centered city, not the disappearance of motorized two-wheelers.

The résumé order is changing

No public résumé sample establishes a measured shift by employer or years of experience. What can be judged is what each role and product brief makes relevant: the physical system a candidate owned, production or field problems they handled and the version that reached users.

The materials neither exclude conventional automotive experience nor promise it an advantage. A prototype, a pilot and a customer-ready product are not the same achievement, and treating them as interchangeable weakens a builder’s claim.

For the Production Manager application, relevant evidence would name constraints, failed attempts, the revision that reached users and the operational work that followed. A résumé full of automotive acronyms but no hardware ownership misses the point.

NationalWorks’ May 28, 2026 evidence ledger records that Infinite Machine identified itself as a reindustrialization company. That description favors candidates who can explain how a new vehicle gets made, serviced and improved, not only how a team designed it in CAD. Infinite Machine says Olto vehicles are shipping, and its P1 page says the P1 is available to order. Candidates should describe Infinite Machine as expanding production and service around existing products, not as a company whose hardware remains confined to a presentation.

Mission fit has to be specific

Generic environmental language gives a reviewer little to test. The company’s product brief offers better material. The P1 can park between two cars, charge from a regular outlet and run without a motorcycle license at lower speeds until a software unlock raises its limit. A candidate can address those constraints directly instead of claiming a general belief in sustainability.

For a creative candidate, the task is to turn those differences into a coherent identity. The P1 and the compact, bike-lane Olto are not visual versions of one object. They make the same city argument only if the work respects the use case attached to each product.

Applications that name the city problem give a reviewer something specific to test. The company’s ambition is better for cities, people and the planet; traffic, parking, charging access and street space make it testable.

The product reaches beyond the machine

The P1 combines hardware with software. Riders can unlock the vehicle and track its location through an app; cameras, anti-lock brakes, a software-controlled speed limit and security features support the ride. The P1 page lists US and EU homologation among its compliance features. Applicants who treat the company as a purely mechanical exercise miss much of the product.

For customer support, the work continues after the vehicle leaves the factory. Infinite Machine works with nationwide service partners, publishes self-service repair guides and supplies spare parts. The relevant experience is tracing a physical failure through a customer, a service network and the software or documentation needed to solve it.

For retail, the narrower question is whether the candidate can teach the product and prepare someone for a ride. The company offers P1 test rides at its headquarters, making customer education part of the job rather than a sideline task.

A June 2025 Ekho case study shows how much work lies behind buying another kind of vehicle. Infinite Machine’s digital sales system handles deposits, state-by-state sales rules, financing, registration and titling. A customer-operations candidate who can discuss that end-to-end purchase brings more credibility than one who only admires the styling.

The strongest application can be compressed into a one-page build map. Name the physical thing, its production status, the customer problem and the city constraint it addressed. Then explain what the build taught you. End with a release, not a concept.

What a Small Hiring Batch Signals for a Non-Car Startup

The live board lists four roles spanning production, customer contact, sales and creative work. The snapshot does not establish a mass expansion, a planned hire count or a production deadline. Its significance lies in what surrounds the launch: a company with a product and a pitch is building the systems needed to make both repeatable.

Infinite Machine was founded in 2021 after Joseph Cohen’s gas-powered Vespa was stolen and the search for an electric replacement, an origin story described in a Cheddar interview. Neither brother had built a motorcycle or scooter before that, and the P1 was still the company’s first attempt at a complete vehicle when it reached global launch. The next challenge is production discipline, not another prototype.

The 2023 launch release opened deposits for the first thousand scooters while deliveries remained pending. The following year, Infinite Machine scheduled a limited First Edition run, described it as the company’s second production run and opened orders for Batch II. The company called that batch a step toward higher-volume production. The sequence shows staged output, but it does not prove mass production.

In October 2024, Infinite Machine announced a $9.3 million seed round led by Andreessen Horowitz’s American Dynamism fund. TechCrunch and company counsel Fenwick reported $9 million, so the two figures should not be merged into one confirmed total. The company said the money would accelerate P1 production and its US launch, and it forecast deliveries to begin the following year. The current P1 page maintains a deposit-to-shipment tracker, but a forecast did not confirm an on-time delivery. The company has built systems for orders and shipments; those systems are not proof of high-volume output.

A 2023 report said the company wanted to build its own manufacturing facility. That is a stated goal rather than proof of an operating factory. Its headquarters includes a prototyping space, but the production vacancy suggests a need for dedicated ownership of repeatable output. For a hardware company, that assignment is a stronger clue to its stage than another listing: the immediate task is turning a limited production run into a dependable process.

The customer-facing vacancies point to a second constraint. They suggest that Infinite Machine wants feedback, service and sales contact close to the product while its production and delivery process takes shape. TechCrunch reported that the company planned to sell directly and hand-deliver vehicles at small scale rather than outsource logistics immediately. That model puts customer operations beside the sale itself.

The design vacancy adds another kind of pressure. The role is relevant to a company that has to explain a seated, two-passenger scooter as a credible city vehicle while teaching riders how its software, storage and modular accessories work. The opening fits a small launch team, even as the communication task grows with the product.

The launch model paired hardware and software with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, storage beneath the seat and between the rider’s legs, and a rear mount for cargo accessories. Those are the details a builder can discuss when asked whether the vehicle works as a coherent object rather than a collection of parts.

The P1 is intended to handle a defined urban trip, not every car journey at once. Infinite Machine’s larger plan adds other city vehicles, software and services around it. The current hiring batch is about proving that the first product can move from a limited run into a dependable one.

That ambition still carries execution risk. Seed funding supports the attempt but does not validate performance or consumer demand. The materials neither promise a preference for automotive credentials nor reject them. Hardware-specific evidence is simply a more direct way to show readiness for an unusual vehicle.

Stable P1 production, confirmed deliveries and a service operation that does not turn early buyers into a support burden are the tests that matter now. Until they appear, applicants should weigh the roles against real execution risk.

For an applicant, the credible case mirrors the product itself: name the machine, explain the failure and revision, and show how it serves a defined city trip. The next proof should arrive under its own power, not as another promise.

Working in frontier tech? Zero G Talent tracks the openings: see every open Infinite Machine role, browse frontier tech jobs, the companies hiring, and the people building the field.